Disappointed to see my previous comment removed which was extraordinarily constructive. Perhaps this is part of the reason for the dysfunction noted with this issue. I will not be contributing to any furtherance of this issue in future.
This is a highly informative article and it asks a lot of good questions about why the County is moving forward ward unilaterally. Unfortunately, much remains very cloudy and obtuse. One has to wonder whether the county intends to pull out of the MTC joint operation and leave the city holding the bag.
Disappointed to see my previous comment removed which was extraordinarily constructive. Perhaps this is part of the reason for the dysfunction noted with this issue. I will not be contributing to any furtherance of this issue in future.
Actually, your comment was on a different post, the one headed "Spend now, talk later" The comment is still there.
We didn't remove it. No idea what happened.
Thanks for the background on this issue. It was very informative
This is a highly informative article and it asks a lot of good questions about why the County is moving forward ward unilaterally. Unfortunately, much remains very cloudy and obtuse. One has to wonder whether the county intends to pull out of the MTC joint operation and leave the city holding the bag.